LBIC ID вЂ“ ANJYP1403
GROUP вЂ“ two
Fighting Dog testing!
Pets or animals have been a part of scientific experiments ever since 17th century and expanded around Europe over the 19th hundred years. The progression of the medical science produced testing medicines on pets or animals legal in the Medicines Action, 1968 which majorly faster the number of family pets tested upon to over a few. 5 , 000, 000 in 1970. Even though animals aided in most medical advances including insulin, polio vaccine, penicillin and removal of little pox, the dog welfare criteria were not controlled until initial January 2013 in UK, which generated a sharp decline in the number of pets or animals. CITATION His13 \l 1033 (Anon., 2013)This essay is to draw attention towards protection against the use of animals in medical experiments. Animal testing is usually undeniably vicious to the types as countless of them are murdered and wounded in trials and placed captive because of their lives for even more torture. There are so many tests, which are conducted with them and are not approved and ultimately there is loss of lives of pets or animals without any profit to human beings. Moreover, there is a huge amount pounds spent to conduct this kind of tests (which may take months), the animals are supposed to be fed, caged, cared and drugged. CITATION Ian14 \l 1033 (Murnaghan, 2014)Human creatures differ from family pets and have a more complex body system than regarding animals that is why experiments carried out on them aren't sufficiently appropriate and therefore may not be relied upon. QUOTATION Hel11 \l 1033 (Marston, 2011)According to Archibald (2005), have identified animal screening less predictive than throwing a coin. Hundreds of medications have been effective and safe on animals, which are analyzed but have murdered or hurt humans in clinical remedies. " Of 22 drugs shown to have been healing in spinal cord injury in animals, not merely one is effective in humans. Of 20 substances known to not cause cancer in human beings, 19 do cause cancers in rats. вЂќ Various multinational businesses have...
Bibliography: BIBLIOGRAPHY Anon., 2013. Good animal research. [Online] Offered at: http://www.understandinganimalresearch.org.uk/resources/animal-testing-essay-writing-resources/resources-for-student-essays-history-of-animal-research/ [Accessed 19 October 2014].
Murnaghan, We., 2014. Applying Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons. [Online] Sold at: http://www.aboutanimaltesting.co.uk/using-animals-testing-pros-versus-cons.html [Accessed 19 October 2014].
Marston, L., 2011. Is definitely animal screening necessary to improve medicalВ research?. [Online] Available at: http://newint.org/sections/argument/2011/06/01/animal-testing-medical-research-laurie-pycroft-pro-test/ [Accessed 2014].
Anon., n. g. the lush coverage. [Online] Offered at: http://www.fightinganimaltesting.com/the-lush-campaign/different-testing-policies/the-lush-policy/ [Accessed 19 October 2014].
PETA, d. d. alternatives to dog testing. [Online] Available at: http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/alternatives-animal-testing/ [Accessed 19 October 2014].
PETA, n. m. The Body Shop and Ben 's of Maine even now cruelty-free. [Online] Available at: http://www.peta.org/living/beauty/body-shop-tom-s-maine/ [Accessed 19 August 2014].
Archibald, K., (2005). AnimalResearch. Details. Animal tests: science or perhaps fiction? Offered by: http://www.animalresearch.info/en/resources/quotes/animal-testsless-predicitve-tossing-coin/ [Accessed 19 October 2014]
(Word Count вЂ“ 513)