A continuing matter within physical education is definitely the proper part and standard of competition. Many of the abuses linked to organized sport are believed to be the consequence of an overemphasis on competition, of a win-at-all -costs point of view.
It is not unheard of for physical educators to advocate minimizing competition, to change competitive actions with supportive activities, and modify competitive activities in ways that decrease competitiveness.
In its most intense form, this sort of criticism inside the physical-education job suggests that competitive activities happen to be harmful for children.
The issue can be viewed from an additional perspective. The problem is not whether competition is good or all bade, but rather is usually how we can eliminate awful competition and emphasize great competition.
Great competition creates a festival ambiance, with all the going to traditions, traditions, and celebrations. Good competition creates a forum within which in turn children and youth may test themselves against recognized standards of excellence.
Good competition requires rivalry, nevertheless never the kind of rivalry through which one part can succeed only to the extent the other part loses.
Very good competition does mean striving inside the rules and traditions to accomplish the best you are able to and then, when the competition is over, understanding that the winning or perhaps losing include little that means outside the competition itself.
Awful competition, alternatively, should be removed. Using the guidelines to gain an advantage, assuming that in order to succeed is to have the best score, disregarding the traditions and rituals with the activity, and letting the final results affect you after the competition is over are generally indications of inappropriate competition.
Students in physical education should the differences between good and bad competition. The only way they will do this is to have this stuff pointed out to them as they experience good competition.